Flying the Brittan Norman Trislander
Climb on
board by the front starboard door and settle into the left seat, the cockpit is
an ergonomic nightmare, identical switches randomly placed all over the place.
You would expect the flight instruments to be behind the control column and in
front of the pilot, no this is the Trislander, the basic six instruments are
three inches offset to the left, you get used to it but it takes some time.
Engine
starting was neat, and if sitting behind the pilot you had to pay attention, as
it seemed just a blur of the left hand over a row of identical switches. After
pushing in the green mixture levers at the top of the flight panel, unusual as
they are nowhere near the other engine controls, and priming all three engines
together by the throttle levers, no priming pumps, and after a thumbs up to the ground crew outside it start all three in about 15 seconds, no starting
each in turn followed by checks just all three as quickly as possible.
Generators
on then start taxing, the nose wheel is steerable, after a fashion, as it is steerable
from the rudder pedals for a few degrees then became castering, all good in
theory but on all the Trislanders this was incredibly stiff and no matter how
hard you pushed nothing moved. Eventually, you got the knack, and you would
always see Trislander pilots thinking ahead and parking with the nose wheel
pointed in the way they wanted to go when taxing away.
Take off is straight
forward and only needs a short runway, however, the noise both inside and out is
high. You may have thought the wings provided the lift, however, there is a
theory apparently provided by BN:
How the Trislander flies is a question
that has puzzled aerodynamicists and pilots for many years, the theory has it that actually
its noise which causes the Trislander to fly. The vibration set up by the
engines, and amplified by the airframe, in turn, causes the air molecules above
the wing to oscillate at an atomic frequency, reducing their density and creating
lift. This can be demonstrated by the sudden closure of the throttles, which causes
the aircraft to rapidly descend. Theory of flight according to BN is, the lift is
proportional to noise, rather than speed, explaining amongst other things the
aircraft's remarkable take-off performance. To
summarise throttles forward more noise more lift climb, throttles back less
noise less lift descend.
Take off and
climb performance when empty is reasonable but when heavy demands attention.
Centre engine failure is hard to identify, monitoring climb performance and
keeping an eye on the rearview mirror (1960 Triumph car part) will help. Port
or starboard failure is far easier to spot, however, whichever engine it is
vital to maintain the correct airspeed 80kts, if you became distracted and
allowed the aircraft to slow below 80kts there was no way to stop the aircraft
turning, it demands high concentration and discipline. Altitude is critical as
at max weight you can only expect a two engine ceiling of 1750 ft. So identify
then feather the engine otherwise you’re not going anywhere.
The three 260
hp Lycoming O-540 engines had carburettors, and many pilots developed the technique of applying carb heat on all three engines together. This resulted in
many cut knuckles at first but did reduce the out of sync engine noise
upsetting the passengers.
Engines were
leaned at any altitude (BN flight manual instruction) and coupled with a constant need to sync the engines kept pilots very busy. Syncing the three
Trislander engines was an art, one which I don’t think any pilot really
mastered, but nothing is more satisfying than the three engines purring away in
sync, even if only for a few minutes. Leaning the engines of course would
produce out of sync engines, so do it first, and at night Trislander pilots
have the joy of leaning the rear engine by the exhaust colour as seen in the
rearview mirror.
Bring the
aircraft onto downwind at cruise speed and slow as you come onto finals,
selecting flap gave a high nose attitude so there’s an excuse to fly a
“spitfire” curving approach. Flare for landing and hold off gave a smooth, if
you were lucky, landing. The challenging
approach was an ILS to minima, as the pilot knew he had 18 eyes peering over
his shoulder watching the instruments and looking for the runway. More than one
had after a go around from minima, the passenger behind him tap his shoulder
and say, I saw the lights why did you go around!
I heard over
the years many clichés said about the Trislander, the last bastion of true aviation, bush flying with runways, the yellow
peril, however alas the Channel
Islands have seen and heard the last Trislander.
For me, I
look back at a great aircraft, a joy to fly, the single pilot operation was
demanding but slick and an aircraft which even today, I would like to think I
could jump in and fly.





Comments
Post a Comment